Path of least resistance

Kelly: “I don’t know. There’s no way of knowing. But you can’t live in fear.”
Bryant: “Yes, you can.”

Hah. I guess he’s right! ;)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Path of least resistance

  1. отзывы says:

    Learn how to write an assessment of literature.
    Подробнее читайте здесь – отзывы
    What is an assessment literature?
    Writing the introduction
    Writing the entire body
    Writing the actual final outcome
    What is evaluation literature?
    The format of evaluation literature can vary greatly from discipline to discipline and from assignment
    to assignment.

    A review could be a self-contained unit — a conclusion in itself — or perhaps a preface to and rationale for undertaking primary research.
    A review is usually a required a part of grant and research proposals and frequently a chapter in theses and dissertations.

    Generally, the purpose of your review should be to analyze critically a segment of the published body
    expertise through summary, classification, and comparison of prior studies, reviews
    of literature, and theoretical articles.

    Writing the introduction
    In the introduction, you need to:

    Define or identify the final topic, issue, or section of
    concern, thus providing a proper context for reviewing the literature.

    Point out overall trends using what has been published
    about the subject; or conflicts theoretically, methodology,
    evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or even a single problem or new
    perspective of immediate interest.
    Establish the writer’s reason (perspective) for reviewing the literature;
    explain the standards to be used in analyzing and comparing literature
    plus the organization with the review (sequence); and, at
    the appropriate time, state why certain literature is
    or possibly is not included (scope).

    Writing our bodies
    In our bodies, you must:

    Group scientific tests and other kinds of literature (reviews,
    theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) in line
    with common denominators like qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of
    authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.

    Summarize individual studies or articles with the maximum amount of
    or very little detail as each merits in accordance with its comparative
    importance from the literature, remembering that space (length) denotes significance.

    Provide people with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts”
    throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences
    at intermediate points inside the review to assistance with understanding comparisons and analyses.

    Writing concluding
    In in conclusion, you must:

    Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles for the body of information under review,
    maintaining the target established inside
    Evaluate the latest “state in the art” with the body of information reviewed, mentioning major
    methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies the theory is
    that and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to
    future study.
    Conclude by giving some advice about the relationship involving the
    central topic in the literature review plus a larger part of study for
    example a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or even a profession.

    For additional information see our handouts on Writing a Critical Review
    of an Nonfiction Book or Article or Reading a Book to Review It.

    To find out more on literature reviews, check out our workshop on Writing Literature Reviews of Published Research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>